In the same vein as the post I just reblogged, I took far more pleasure than I should have last year in writing a mini-dissertation on the power structure of the goa’uld (from Stargate SG-1), precisely because it was ‘popular’ source material.
I took even more pleasure in the fact that I got a first class mark for it.
Yeeeah I went on a bit /facepalm
*insert some ranting about academic snobbery*
I was talking with someone the other day who said that my uni “prided itself on producing many literary writers of great reknown” and I’m afraid we both then had a little snigger about pretentious rubbish which is mean and wrong. I mean it’s ok that I think that but I should phrase it differently because it implies a value judgement which is incorrect. What I should say is that it’s not to my taste, which is kinda the whole point I’m driving at.
Literary fiction isn’t the only kind of worthy fiction in the world. Just because something is popular doesn’t mean it’s not good. The problem with me stating my opinion on this is that I’m not a graduate, I don’t have any kind of academic pedigree to give my opinion any merit. I firmly believe that there is a lot to learn from all kinds of literature, every genre, literary or popular, hell I firmly support fanfic as I find the transformative nature creative and fascinating.
I respect all words. True I don’t enjoy everything in existence but then who does? In my naughty moments I call it pretentious twaddle but even as I say it I know that’s not right. I just really wish that the respect was returned and that academic institutions quit preaching that literary is the only fiction worth a damn.
As a side note, on the literature side of the coin (as opposed to just the creative writing), I really wish we’d study more variety. 95% of it is old white men, usually written a hundred years ago or more. The excuse trotted out is that those things have “stood the test of time” but in whose opinion? Sometimes I think that we only think things are important because we’ve been told they are so many times we don’t question it.
If we’re looking at literature in the scope of history, then damn straight we need to read older works. If we’re just analysing literature for form or technique, then why not read modern stuff? Why not read ‘popular’ works? Not everything has to be literary and not everything should come from Europe. Now yeah there are a few exceptions but those exceptions only highlight how uniform the rest of the curriculum is.
/grumble /grumble
(I don’t hate my degree btw, I’m just frustrated)